Europa universalis iv dlc wiki how to#

There are some I don't own but whose features are on listed on the Wiki and Craddle of Civilization comes to mind, I think that one is meant to overhaul islamic nations but a feature to drill armies that applies to all nations is locked behind it. Wealth of Nations and Dharma are also similar in this. The transfer occupation mechanics works quite well with it almost like they were meant to work together and yet they are in two different DLCs. Like the diplomatic feedback thing being a part of the Cossacks DLC. Yes, the norm should be that we assume all things are made with good will by devs but the truth is there are lots of mechanics which apply to all nations but are featured in DLCs whose name suggest they would add regional content. PDX didn't become a $2 billion company in 2 decades by reacting and hiring a bunch of disorganised artists and developers who kowtow to their forums.

Europa universalis iv dlc wiki how to#

They know their customers and know how to keep them paying, even if they are droolingly incompetent at times. You give Paradox less credit than they deserve. A company will react and do new things, but they will also try to ensure recurring revenue. Not everything is controlled by evil billionaires. Developers have also changed over time and the guys doing new content now have very little idea what exactly was released in 2014 and why. Some of them are artists, some are game designers, but it has never included hundreds of developers. I would say average size of the team doing DLCs has been 5-10. You are probably also thinking there is large team working on EU4. It is not like developers have really big chart of things where every detail is pointed out to maximize the profit. If players complain about HRE mechanic or ask for custom nation or ability to kill the heir, these things are added. Once many players start to ask for better exploration, it gets redesigned. They go for 1-3 years at best.ДЄlso, if you look at the history of DLCs released for EU4 you can clearly see developers are adding stuff that players ask for. Nobody plans DLCs 6 years ahead because most games do not last that long. Every day hundreds of new games are released and most go unnoticed or get angry webmob campaigning against them. The best publisher hopes for is that they release a game and it is well received and enough players like it. You are assuming every publisher and developer has some big plan to scam money out of players over 10 years. Originally posted by Very serious person:I can't help but wonder if some of these decisions were purposefully made by Paradox to essentially cheat us a bit. Like, you can't call it a scam because it isn't the features of each DLC are listed and you can check but I think they very well know these things when they design their DLCs. I haven't played yet as an indian nation or a nomadic nation and I'm still not interested but I own the Cossacks and Dharma because I felt they were needed to complete the features the other 2 DLCs I bought lacked. Tbh, it's my fault for not reading the features myself but I also feel it is kind of deceiving and that it is done that way to make you buy two DLC instead of one.

Apparently the rest of what I wanted was in another DLC called Dharma which I simply assume by the name was meant to rework Indian nations were played.

I repeatedly made the mistake of buying without checking explicitely what that DLC offered and I got Wealth of Nations which added some of the features I wanted but not all. This happened to me again when I wanted to add that feature of trade companies, investments, buying charter companies, improving centers of trade and all that stuff to my game. Why put a general mechanic for all countries which honestly makes the game quite different in one whose name would seem to suggest is about playing as Orthodox nomads in Eastern Europe? So I went to check out which DLC I needed for that and I saw Art of War, by the name of that product I'd assume of all of that went into that DLC but no, another feature I wanted came in The Cossacks DLC which to me sounded weird. I've enjoyed the game and the things the DLC added but I remember what drew me to buy some of the DLCs was gameplay from some of the Youtubers I was watching play this game.ДЇor example I was watching Arumba play and saw him promising land to an ally as well as lots of new CBs and war reparations and whatnot, I also saw him transferring occupation. So I'm a fairly new player and I got the base game about a month ago and since then I've played a lot and purchased some DLC. I can't help but wonder if some of these decisions were purposefully made by Paradox to essentially cheat us a bit.